Case documents · No. B355195

Court documents in Borenstein v. Goldshteyn before the California Court of Appeal

California Court of Appeal · Second Appellate District · Division Five

Law Office of J.R. Howell
Counsel for Sofiya Goldshteyn

This collection brings together the opening brief, the appealed rulings, and the principal trial materials. Briefs present the parties’ arguments. The court’s rulings state its findings and decisions.

Start with the opening brief

Filed October 19, 2026

Sofiya’s appellate opening brief

The brief presents Sofiya’s account of the record, her constitutional and contractual arguments, and the judgment she asks the Court of Appeal to direct. Its citations link to authorities and appendix materials.

63 pages · California Court of Appeal No. B355195

Official Reporter’s Transcript

Read the official trial transcript

The February 24, 2026 trial testimony, including the examination of Sofiya and Max. This is the official transcript cited as RT in the opening brief.

Appellant’s Appendix

The complete appendix is provided in four PDF files. Its printed AA page numbers continue across the files. The opening brief links to the corresponding PDF pages.

Appellant’s appendix, PDF file 1 of 4

Appellate record

Use the appendix’s printed page numbers when following AA citations in the opening brief. The brief’s links open the corresponding PDF page.

Appellant’s appendix, PDF file 2 of 4

Filed October 7, 2026

Use the appendix’s printed page numbers when following AA citations in the opening brief. The brief’s links open the corresponding PDF page.

Appellant’s appendix, PDF file 3 of 4

Appellate record

Use the appendix’s printed page numbers when following AA citations in the opening brief. The brief’s links open the corresponding PDF page.

Appellant’s appendix, PDF file 4 of 4

Appellate record

Use the appendix’s printed page numbers when following AA citations in the opening brief. The brief’s links open the corresponding PDF page.

Cases, Statutes, and Authorities

Browse the authorities cited in the brief

Search by name or citation, filter by source type, and open the corresponding legal materials.

Trial rulings and submissions

April 23 decision and May 12 ruling on objections, with related minute orders

April 23 and May 12, 2026

The April decision and the May ruling adopting it as modified set out the court’s findings and disposition orders.

Sofiya’s trial brief

February 13, 2026

Sofiya’s account of her life, fertility treatment, and legal position before trial. Sofiya was the respondent in the trial court and is the appellant here.

Max Borenstein’s trial brief

February 13, 2026

Max Borenstein’s position on the agreements and the disputed embryos before trial.

Max Borenstein’s closing trial brief

April 10, 2026

Max’s posttrial arguments concerning the directives and reproductive interests.

Sofiya’s reply to Max’s closing trial brief

April 16, 2026

Sofiya’s response to Max’s closing arguments in the trial court.

Sofiya’s request for a statement of decision

February 24, 2026

The findings and determinations Sofiya requested from the trial court.

Sofiya’s objections to the proposed statement of decision

May 4, 2026

Sofiya’s objections to the April decision. Read with the court’s May 12 ruling.

February 24, 2026 trial transcript, public copy

Hearing on February 24, 2026

The testimony at trial. This public copy has different pagination from the official appellate reporter’s transcript.

Constitutional and legislative materials

Proposition 1 voter information and ballot materials

2022 Proposition 1 materials

Voter information concerning California’s 2022 reproductive-freedom amendment.

Legislative history of the Reproductive Privacy Act

Legislative-history compilation

A compilation of legislative materials concerning California’s Reproductive Privacy Act, available through Google Drive.

Using the record

The public trial transcript linked here uses pagination different from the official appellate transcript. For an appellate citation, use the official record references in the opening brief and check the corresponding record page.

Descriptions of the appealed orders do not establish that research donation, destruction, or transfer has occurred. The opening brief requests preservation while Sofiya’s claims are resolved.

The amicus invitation identifies issues for potential briefs and explains the filing procedure.

The Law Office of J.R. Howell represents Sofiya Goldshteyn in this appeal.

jr@lojrh.com · (323) 897-8656

This account is provided by counsel for Sofiya Goldshteyn and presents her position in pending litigation. The linked documents identify the parties’ arguments and the court’s rulings. J.R. Howell is licensed to practice in California and restricts his practice to California.